Protecting Our Purple Pipes

By Don Vandertulip, PE
Chair, WEF Water Reuse Committee

I’ll start at the beginning of this important issue, which is ultimately about organizations working together to protect public health and sustainable water supplies. Purple is the standard color for pipe adopted by the international utility industry to distribute municipally treated reclaimed water. In late June 2008, a question was raised alerting water reuse professionals to a proposed plumbing code that would require use of purple pipe for all graywater systems. The proposal was embedded in updates to the 2009 Uniform Plumbing Code under final development by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO) and the indication was all reuse organizations had approved it. IAPMO used the Canadian CSA B128 Design and Installation of NonPotable Systems as a guide to coordinate with international standards.

Utility members and reuse professionals at the Water Environment Association (WEF), the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and the WateReuse Association (WRA) were not aware of this proposed change, and they responded—along with several state health departments—based on a three-decade history of distributing high-quality reclaimed water through purple pipe and gaining public support for highly treated reclaimed water. Their concerns included:

• Potential cross connections between two purple pipe systems with significantly different quality;
  
• The public could be exposed to inadequately treated water in a municipal purple pipe system contaminated by an on-site cross connection; and,
  
• Public exposure and cross connections would negatively impact public confidence in the municipal reclaimed water system.
  

Based on this feedback, a joint letter signed by Executive Directors of WEF, AWWA, and WRA was submitted to IAPMO on September 24, 2008. I believe this letter represents the first letter endorsed by the three organizations in a common effort to eliminate a public health threat. In a separate action, Florida Department of Health (FDEP) sent a letter protesting the proposed Code.

Discussions at WEFTEC.08 among representatives of IAPMO and all three water groups regarding Code revision revealed that the issue included not only on-site graywater systems but also other sources of alternate water to include rainwater harvested water, stormwater, and air conditioning condensate and showed that other entities unfamiliar with reclaimed water production might influence its use, distribution, and quality.

Based on all of the input they received, IAPMO formed a Task Group to review the proposed code requirements and to develop alternative code requirements acceptable to plumbing code inspectors and municipal utility providers. I was appointed to this committee to represent WEF and WRA, while Alan Rimer, Chair of the AWWA Water Reuse Committee will represent AWWA.

The bottom line is that technical solutions will be developed for consideration by both reclaimed water utility interests and plumbing code enforcement officials. Water utilities and professionals have done a good job of “branding” purple pipe and educating constituents within the immediate service area about the value of reclaimed water use to the community. It is now apparent that water professionals, utilities, and state health departments must become more involved with local, state and national building code development to ensure that highly treated reclaimed water protects public health and guards against public exposure to inadequately treated alternate waters originating from on-site treatment units. I believe this increased involvement should include:

• Improved communications between IAPMO and professionals from the water field by providing technical presentations to educate each other about their respective approaches to public health;
  
• Improved education within our own house-including utility, health and environmental department professionals so we can recognize well-intended efforts by others that may impact the value of our purple pipe liquid assets;
  
• Evaluation, by utilities, of state and local regulations that may be in conflict with the Plumbing Codes adopted by the local communities and direct communication with the state entities to provide clear regulations protective of public health without causing regulatory conflict; and,
  
• Identification of additional common code/public health concerns related to use of non-potable water on property also served with potable water that should be mutually addressed.

The IAPMO Task Group and greater utility awareness are good starts. It is incumbent on all water utility professionals to work toward improved recognition of design controls and regulations that are supportive of public health and sustainable water supply solutions. Meanwhile, I’d invite you to visit www.iapmo.org to learn more about this important code development organization and watch for further developments as we all work together for a cleaner environment.

10/14/2009 Protecting Our Purple Pipes  ()   Posted December 1, 2008 I’ll start at the beginning of this important issue, which is ultimately about organizations working together to protect public health and sustainable water supplies. Purple is the standard color for pipe adopted by the international utility industry to distribute municipally treated reclaimed water.  In late June 2008, a question was raised alerting water reuse professionals to a proposed plumbing code that would require use of purple pipe for all graywater systems. Comments (34) IAPMO certified a new replacement for the backflow prevention bonnet and poppet assembly for the Febco 765 pressure vacuum breaker. It protects against backflow as well as OEM, but it is far more durable. ---David Powers Limited 6889 Xavier Circle, Westminster, CO 80030--- Posted by: Febco (infinity2926@yahoo.com) on 08/15/2010 I completely agree with you. It would bring confusion. And what is the reason to change the system which was so well made up? Posted by: Shared files SE (rainsanders8@gmail.com) on 11/24/2010 I heard about that new replacement part, but I wasn't able to find the IAPMO certification on it. I did find the ASSE certification though. It looks like it's a lot more durable than the OEM version. Posted by: Febco 765 Repair Kit (infinity2926@yahoo.com) on 03/05/2011 J'ai entendu parler de cette partie de remplacement, mais je n'étais pas capable de trouver la certification IAPMO sur elle. Je n'ai pas trouvé la certification ASSE bien. On dirait qu'il ya beaucoup plus durable que la version OEM. Posted by: DenisMiller (mathew.daniela@yahoo.com) on 07/15/2011 The improvement was so clear. I am glad i find your post. It made my day. Thanks and keep up. I agree with you. Posted by: Charlotte (suzettecharlote@yahoo.com) on 07/15/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (-1') on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 -1' Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 1 Posted by: (1) on 08/05/2011 The replacement part is definitely IAPMO certified. But it's not made out of plastic, but rather a poly carbonate construction. That is a reason for its durability. Posted by: Plastic Repair (sara@davidpowerslimited.com) on 08/09/2011 Hi there,Really nice job,There are many people searching about that now they will find enough sources by your tips,Also looking forward for more tips about that Posted by: Generic Cialis (mattpowell157@gmail.com) on 08/10/2011 Hi there,Really nice job,There are many people searching about that now they will find enough sources by your tips,Also looking forward for more tips about that Posted by: Generic Cialis (mattpowell157@gmail.com) on 08/10/2011 This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing websites that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. It?s the old what goes around comes around routine. Did you acquired lots of links and I see lots of trackbacks?? Posted by: Jerry (working12311@hotmail.com) on 08/29/2011 Nice site! I enjoy a couple of from the articles which have been written, and particularly the comments posted! I will definately be visiting again! Posted by: Jason Aldean Tickets (ticketloot000@gmail.com) on 09/06/2011 Great tips, I would like to join your blog anyway, Posted by: ドボネックス (simonnicolos@gmail.com) on 09/27/2011 hey,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the same theme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post. Posted by: Dream Vacation Network (erik.kriss24@gmail.com) on 09/27/2011 Lovely blog you got going here, chief! Posted by: Solar Motion Detector Lights (mceachernjohn@gmail.com) on 09/29/2011 The perfect system should never be changed unless it's a really bad one though but I think it's good in meantime. Posted by: Boston Market Coupons (securitybyfacebook@gmail.com) on 10/24/2011